Chalcophora massiliensis

Chalcophora massiliensis

Chalcophora massiliensis

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Porto

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

5 Verified sightings at Porto
56 In all 3 parks From 2019 to 2026
April Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Doñana National Park 🇪🇸 Spain
~20%
2 Cévennes National Park 🇫🇷 France
~10%
3 Sierra de Guadarrama National Park 🇪🇸 Spain
<5%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Porto 🇵🇹 Portugal
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Chalcophora massiliensis in Porto?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chalcophora massiliensis sighting in Porto on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 457th most-seen of the 498 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Chalcophora massiliensis in Porto?

April

In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chalcophora massiliensis in Porto on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Chalcophora massiliensis?

Between 1 and 4 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chalcophora massiliensis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Where else can you see a Chalcophora massiliensis?

Only Porto, in our data

Porto is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Chalcophora massiliensis sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Where does the Chalcophora massiliensis sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Chalcophora massiliensis is recorded against all the insects logged in Porto (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Porto