Panorpa meridionalis

Panorpa meridionalis

Panorpa meridionalis

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Porto

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

38 Verified sightings at Porto
114 In all 3 parks From 2019 to 2026
April Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Aigüestortes National Park 🇪🇸 Spain
~20%
2 Pyrénées National Park 🇫🇷 France
~10%
3 Sierra de Guadarrama National Park 🇪🇸 Spain
<5%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Barcelona 🇪🇸 Spain
~10%
2 Porto 🇵🇹 Portugal
~10%
3 Lisbon 🇵🇹 Portugal
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Panorpa meridionalis in Porto?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Panorpa meridionalis sighting in Porto on a given day, based on 38 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 144th most-seen of the 498 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Panorpa meridionalis in Porto?

April

In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Panorpa meridionalis in Porto on a given day, against under 5% in June to February, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Panorpa meridionalis?

Between 10 am and 1 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Panorpa meridionalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Porto the best place to see a Panorpa meridionalis?

Among the best

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Panorpa meridionalis sightings, Porto ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Barcelona (Spain, about 10%).

Where does the Panorpa meridionalis sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Panorpa meridionalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Porto (38 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Porto