Psyllobora confluens

Psyllobora confluens

Psyllobora confluens

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Recife

In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%

5 Verified sightings at Recife
January Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Recife 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 Fortaleza 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
3 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
4 Lima 🇵🇪 Peru
~10%
5 Caracas 🇻🇪 Venezuela
~10%
6 Belo Horizonte 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%
7 Medellín 🇨🇴 Colombia
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Psyllobora confluens in Recife?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Psyllobora confluens sighting in Recife on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 51st most-seen of the 67 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Psyllobora confluens in Recife?

January

In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Psyllobora confluens in Recife on a given day, against under 5% in February and May–November, the lowest months.

Is Recife the best place to see a Psyllobora confluens?

Yes

Of the 7 cities where we can rate Psyllobora confluens sightings, Recife has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Fortaleza (Brazil, about 10%) and São Paulo (Brazil, about 10%).

Which relatives of the Psyllobora confluens live in Recife?

Same family: Coccinellidae

The closest relatives of the Psyllobora confluens that you can see in Recife (family Coccinellidae, Lady Beetles) are Variable Ladybird Beetle (about 20%) and Spotless Lady Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Psyllobora confluens sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Psyllobora confluens is recorded against all the insects logged in Recife (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Recife