Lepidoneiva erubescens
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Lepidoneiva is a genus of moths in the subfamily Arctiinae. It contains the single species Lepidoneiva erubescens, which is found in Brazil (São Paulo). Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tijuca National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rio de Janeiro | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lepidoneiva erubescens sighting in Rio de Janeiro on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 105th most-seen of the 169 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
December to February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lepidoneiva erubescens in Rio de Janeiro on a given day, against under 5% in March to November, the lowest months. Those are among Rio de Janeiro's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in August.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lepidoneiva erubescens sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Rio de Janeiro, in our data
Rio de Janeiro is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Lepidoneiva erubescens sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Lepidoneiva erubescens that you can see in Rio de Janeiro (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Black Witch (about 10%), Poecilosoma eone (about 10%) and Cosmosoma telephus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lepidoneiva erubescens is recorded against all the insects logged in Rio de Janeiro (7 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
