Hypselonotus fulvus
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henri Pittier National Park | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortaleza | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 🇧🇴 Bolivia | |
| 3 | Vitória | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | Brasilia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 7 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypselonotus fulvus sighting in São Paulo on a given day, based on 54 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 151st most-seen of the 832 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March–May, August–September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hypselonotus fulvus in São Paulo on a given day, against under 5% in February, June–July, October and December, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hypselonotus fulvus sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
6th of 7
Of the 7 cities where we can rate Hypselonotus fulvus sightings, São Paulo ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Fortaleza (Brazil, about 20%), Santa Cruz de la Sierra (Bolivia, about 10%) and Vitória (Brazil, about 10%).
Same genus: Hypselonotus
The closest relatives of the Hypselonotus fulvus that you can see in São Paulo (genus Hypselonotus) are Hypselonotus interruptus (about 10%) and Hypselonotus bitrianguliger (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hypselonotus fulvus is recorded against all the insects logged in São Paulo (54 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
