Naupactus auricinctus

Naupactus auricinctus

Naupactus auricinctus

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at São Paulo

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%

25 Verified sightings at São Paulo
26 In all 3 parks From 2019 to 2026
November Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Itatiaia National Park 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
2 Iguazú National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%
3 Iguaçu National Park 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%
2 Buenos Aires 🇦🇷 Argentina
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Naupactus auricinctus in São Paulo?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Naupactus auricinctus sighting in São Paulo on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 261st most-seen of the 832 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Naupactus auricinctus in São Paulo?

June and October–December

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Naupactus auricinctus in São Paulo on a given day, against under 5% in January–May and July–September, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Naupactus auricinctus?

Between 2 and 5 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Naupactus auricinctus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is São Paulo the best place to see a Naupactus auricinctus?

Yes

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Naupactus auricinctus sightings, São Paulo has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Buenos Aires (Argentina, under 5%).

Where does the Naupactus auricinctus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Naupactus auricinctus is recorded against all the insects logged in São Paulo (25 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to São Paulo