Condylostylus caudatus

Condylostylus caudatus

Condylostylus caudatus

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Washington

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%

90 Verified sightings at Washington
May Best month

About the Condylostylus caudatus

Condylostylus caudatus is a species of long-legged fly in the family Dolichopodidae. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Washington 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
2 New York City 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
3 Boston 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
4 Montreal 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
5 Toronto 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
6 Houston 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
7 Chicago 🇺🇸 United States
<5%
8 Dallas 🇺🇸 United States
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Condylostylus caudatus in Washington?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Condylostylus caudatus sighting in Washington on a given day, based on 90 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 321st most-seen of the 1807 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Condylostylus caudatus in Washington?

May and July

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Condylostylus caudatus in Washington on a given day, against under 5% in June and August–April, the lowest months.

Is Washington the best place to see a Condylostylus caudatus?

Yes

Of the 8 cities where we can rate Condylostylus caudatus sightings, Washington has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come New York City (United States, under 5%) and Boston (United States, under 5%).

Where does the Condylostylus caudatus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Condylostylus caudatus is recorded against all the insects logged in Washington (90 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Washington