What are the chances of seeing a Phaon Crescent in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Phaon Crescent sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 163rd most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Phaon Crescent in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
February, August and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Phaon Crescent in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–July, September and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Phaon Crescent?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Phaon Crescent sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cumbres de Monterrey National Park the best place to see a Phaon Crescent?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Phaon Crescent sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Padre Island National Seashore (United States, about 30%), Big Cypress National Preserve (United States, about 30%) and Ciénaga de Zapata (Cuba, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Phaon Crescent live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same genus: Phyciodes
The closest relatives of the Phaon Crescent that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (genus Phyciodes, Crescents) are Vesta Crescent (about 10%) and Pearl Crescent (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Phaon Crescent sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Phaon Crescent is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.