What are the chances of seeing a Mottle-backed Elaenia in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Mottle-backed Elaenia sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 307th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Mottle-backed Elaenia in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
December
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Mottle-backed Elaenia in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Mottle-backed Elaenia?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mottle-backed Elaenia sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Mottle-backed Elaenia?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Mottle-backed Elaenia sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 4th at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, under 5%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, under 5%) and Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Mottle-backed Elaenia live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Mottle-backed Elaenia that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Lesser Kiskadee (about 50%) and Great Kiskadee (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Mottle-backed Elaenia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mottle-backed Elaenia is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.