What are the chances of seeing a Bocana manifestalis in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bocana manifestalis sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 339th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bocana manifestalis in Daintree National Park?
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Bocana manifestalis in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June and November–January, the lowest months. That is one of Daintree National Park's wettest months, with about 330 mm of rain against 50 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Bocana manifestalis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bocana manifestalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Daintree National Park the best place to see a Bocana manifestalis?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Bocana manifestalis sightings, Daintree National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Bocana manifestalis live in Daintree National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Bocana manifestalis that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%), Asota orbona (about 20%) and Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bocana manifestalis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bocana manifestalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.