What are the chances of seeing a Cryptophasa lasiocosma in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cryptophasa lasiocosma sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 745th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cryptophasa lasiocosma in Daintree National Park?
January, April–May, July and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cryptophasa lasiocosma in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June, August and October–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Cryptophasa lasiocosma?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cryptophasa lasiocosma sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Cryptophasa lasiocosma?
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Cryptophasa lasiocosma sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Cryptophasa lasiocosma live in Daintree National Park?
Same genus: Cryptophasa
The closest relatives of the Cryptophasa lasiocosma that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Cryptophasa) are Cryptophasa xylomima (about 10%), Cryptophasa porphyritis (about 10%) and Cryptophasa flavolineata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cryptophasa lasiocosma sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cryptophasa lasiocosma is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.