What are the chances of seeing a Cryptophasa porphyritis in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cryptophasa porphyritis sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 194th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cryptophasa porphyritis in Daintree National Park?
December
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Cryptophasa porphyritis in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March and June, the lowest months. That is one of Daintree National Park's wettest months, with about 300 mm of rain against 50 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Cryptophasa porphyritis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cryptophasa porphyritis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Cryptophasa porphyritis?
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Cryptophasa porphyritis sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Cryptophasa porphyritis live in Daintree National Park?
Same genus: Cryptophasa
The closest relatives of the Cryptophasa porphyritis that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Cryptophasa) are Cryptophasa xylomima (about 10%), Cryptophasa flavolineata (about 10%) and Cryptophasa rubescens (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cryptophasa porphyritis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cryptophasa porphyritis is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.