What are the chances of seeing a Cryptophasa rubescens in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cryptophasa rubescens sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 745th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cryptophasa rubescens in Daintree National Park?
April and October–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cryptophasa rubescens in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March and May–September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Cryptophasa rubescens?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cryptophasa rubescens sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Daintree National Park the best place to see a Cryptophasa rubescens?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Cryptophasa rubescens sightings, Daintree National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cryptophasa rubescens live in Daintree National Park?
Same genus: Cryptophasa
The closest relatives of the Cryptophasa rubescens that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Cryptophasa) are Cryptophasa xylomima (about 10%), Cryptophasa porphyritis (about 10%) and Cryptophasa flavolineata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cryptophasa rubescens sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cryptophasa rubescens is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.