What are the chances of seeing a Great Sooty Satyr in Ecrins National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Great Sooty Satyr sighting in Ecrins National Park on a given day, based on 51 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 20th most-seen of the 251 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Great Sooty Satyr in Ecrins National Park?
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Great Sooty Satyr in Ecrins National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–June and September–October, the lowest months. That is one of Ecrins National Park's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain against 160 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Great Sooty Satyr?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Great Sooty Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ecrins National Park the best place to see a Great Sooty Satyr?
2nd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Great Sooty Satyr sightings, Ecrins National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Great Sooty Satyr live in Ecrins National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Great Sooty Satyr that you can see in Ecrins National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Marbled White (about 40%), Silver-Washed Fritillary (about 30%) and Small Tortoiseshell (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Great Sooty Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Great Sooty Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Ecrins National Park (51 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.