What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut Seedeater in Emas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Seedeater sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 159th most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut Seedeater in Emas National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Seedeater in Emas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–September and November, the lowest months. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut Seedeater?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut Seedeater sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Chestnut Seedeater?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Chestnut Seedeater sightings, Emas National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 10%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut Seedeater live in Emas National Park?
Same genus: Sporophila
The closest relatives of the Chestnut Seedeater that you can see in Emas National Park (genus Sporophila, Typical Seedeaters and Seed-Finches) are Plumbeous Seedeater (about 60%), Double-collared Seedeater (about 10%) and Chestnut-bellied Seed-Finch (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut Seedeater sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut Seedeater is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.