What are the chances of seeing a Blue-black Grassquit in Emas National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 164 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-black Grassquit in Emas National Park?
August and September
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit in Emas National Park on a given day, against about 50% in July, the lowest month. Those are among Emas National Park's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 190 mm in January. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-black Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
Yes
Of the 73 parks where we can rate Blue-black Grassquit sightings, Emas National Park has the highest daily chance: about 70%. Next come Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 50%) and Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit live in Emas National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit that you can see in Emas National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Black-throated Saltator (about 70%), Saffron Finch (about 70%) and Plumbeous Seedeater (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-black Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-black Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (164 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.