What are the chances of seeing a Black-and-orange Flycatcher in Eravikulam National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black-and-orange Flycatcher sighting in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, based on 187 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 13th most-seen of the 116 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-and-orange Flycatcher in Eravikulam National Park?
November
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Black-and-orange Flycatcher in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, against about 20% in April and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-and-orange Flycatcher?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-and-orange Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Eravikulam National Park the best place to see a Black-and-orange Flycatcher?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Black-and-orange Flycatcher sightings, Eravikulam National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Periyar National Park (India, under 5%) and Mudumalai National Park (India, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-and-orange Flycatcher live in Eravikulam National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Black-and-orange Flycatcher that you can see in Eravikulam National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Pied Bushchat (about 70%), White-bellied Blue Robin (about 70%) and Nilgiri Flycatcher (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-and-orange Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-and-orange Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Eravikulam National Park (187 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.