What are the chances of seeing a Nilgiri Flycatcher in Eravikulam National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Nilgiri Flycatcher sighting in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, based on 297 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 116 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Nilgiri Flycatcher in Eravikulam National Park?
January
In that month about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Nilgiri Flycatcher in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, against about 30% in March, the lowest month. That is one of Eravikulam National Park's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain against 450 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Nilgiri Flycatcher?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nilgiri Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Eravikulam National Park the best place to see a Nilgiri Flycatcher?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Nilgiri Flycatcher sightings, Eravikulam National Park has the highest daily chance: about 60%. Next come Mudumalai National Park (India, under 5%) and Periyar National Park (India, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Nilgiri Flycatcher live in Eravikulam National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Nilgiri Flycatcher that you can see in Eravikulam National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Pied Bushchat (about 70%), White-bellied Blue Robin (about 70%) and Malabar Whistling-Thrush (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Nilgiri Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nilgiri Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Eravikulam National Park (297 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.