What are the chances of seeing a Pied Bushchat in Eravikulam National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Bushchat sighting in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, based on 375 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 3rd most-seen of the 116 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Bushchat in Eravikulam National Park?
March and April
In those months about 90% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Bushchat in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, against about 40% in May, the lowest month. Those are among Eravikulam National Park's driest months, with about 85 mm of rain a month against 450 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Bushchat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Bushchat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Eravikulam National Park the best place to see a Pied Bushchat?
2nd of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Pied Bushchat sightings, Eravikulam National Park ranks 2nd at about 70%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 90%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Bushchat live in Eravikulam National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Bushchat that you can see in Eravikulam National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-bellied Blue Robin (about 70%), Nilgiri Flycatcher (about 60%) and Malabar Whistling-Thrush (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Bushchat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Bushchat is recorded against all the birds logged in Eravikulam National Park (375 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.