What are the chances of seeing a Paddle-Tailed Darner in Glacier National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Paddle-Tailed Darner sighting in Glacier National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 147 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Paddle-Tailed Darner in Glacier National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Paddle-Tailed Darner in Glacier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Paddle-Tailed Darner?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Paddle-Tailed Darner sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Glacier National Park the best place to see a Paddle-Tailed Darner?
Among the best
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Paddle-Tailed Darner sightings, Glacier National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Rocky Mountain National Park (United States, about 10%) and Grand Teton National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Paddle-Tailed Darner live in Glacier National Park?
Same order: Odonata
The closest relatives of the Paddle-Tailed Darner that you can see in Glacier National Park (order Odonata, Dragonflies and Damselflies) are Variegated Meadowhawk (about 10%), Black Meadowhawk (about 10%) and Pale Snaketail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Paddle-Tailed Darner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Paddle-Tailed Darner is recorded against all the insects logged in Glacier National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.