Corgatha dipyra
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Corgatha dipyra is a species of moth of the family Erebidae. It is found in Australia. The adult moth of this species has brown wings with submarginal lines and arcs of dark spots. The wingspan is about 1.5 cm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Corgatha dipyra sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 331st most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January and February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Corgatha dipyra in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to December, the lowest months.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Corgatha dipyra sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Great Otway National Park, in our data
Great Otway National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Corgatha dipyra sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Corgatha dipyra that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Southern Moon Moth (about 20%), Heliotrope Moth (about 10%) and Black-And-White Tiger Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Corgatha dipyra is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
