Castulo doubledayi
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Castulo doubledayi is a moth of the subfamily Arctiinae first described by Edward Newman in 1857. It is found in the Australian states of Victoria and Tasmania. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Doubleday’s Footman sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 162nd most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Doubleday’s Footman in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to December, the lowest months.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Doubleday’s Footman sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Great Otway National Park, in our data
Great Otway National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Doubleday’s Footman sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Doubleday’s Footman that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Southern Moon Moth (about 20%), Heliotrope Moth (about 10%) and Black-And-White Tiger Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Doubleday’s Footman is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
