What are the chances of seeing an Alapadna pauropis in Great Otway National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alapadna pauropis sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 162nd most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alapadna pauropis in Great Otway National Park?
March–April and October–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alapadna pauropis in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and May–September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Alapadna pauropis?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alapadna pauropis sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Great Otway National Park the best place to see an Alapadna pauropis?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Alapadna pauropis sightings, Great Otway National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Alapadna pauropis live in Great Otway National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Alapadna pauropis that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Southern Moon Moth (about 20%), Heliotrope Moth (about 10%) and Black-And-White Tiger Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alapadna pauropis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alapadna pauropis is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.