What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut Quail-thrush in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Quail-thrush sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 656 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 170 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut Quail-thrush in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
January and February
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Quail-thrush in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against about 30% in November, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut Quail-thrush?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut Quail-thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Chestnut Quail-thrush?
Only Hattah-Kulkyne National Park, in our data
Hattah-Kulkyne National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Chestnut Quail-thrush sightings: about 40% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Chestnut Quail-thrush live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Chestnut Quail-thrush that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Yellow-plumed Honeyeater (about 70%), Australian Magpie (about 60%) and Noisy Miner (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut Quail-thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut Quail-thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (656 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.