Eneoptera surinamensis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Eneoptera surinamensis is a species of cricket from the genus Eneoptera. The species was originally described by Charles De Geer in 1773 Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fortaleza | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eneoptera surinamensis sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 185th most-seen of the 306 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Eneoptera surinamensis in Iguazú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June–August and December, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eneoptera surinamensis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Eneoptera surinamensis sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Eneoptera surinamensis that you can see in Iguazú National Park (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Abracris flavolineata (about 30%), Staleochlora arcuata (about 20%) and Meroncidius flavolimbatus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eneoptera surinamensis is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguazú National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
