Tetragonisca fiebrigi
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Impenetrable National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Rosario | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Asuncion | 🇵🇾 Paraguay | |
| 5 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Fiebrig's Stingless Bee sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 64th most-seen of the 306 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March, May, August, October and December–January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Fiebrig's Stingless Bee in Iguazú National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February, April, June–July, September and November, the lowest months.
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fiebrig's Stingless Bee sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Fiebrig's Stingless Bee sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 30%).
Same family: Apidae
The closest relatives of the Fiebrig's Stingless Bee that you can see in Iguazú National Park (family Apidae, Honey Bees, Bumble Bees, and Allies) are Brazilian Bumble Bee (about 10%), Spiny-Legged Stingless Bee (about 10%) and Clavate-Legged Stingless Bee (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fiebrig's Stingless Bee is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguazú National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
