What are the chances of seeing a Five-Bar Swordtail in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Five-Bar Swordtail sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 296 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Five-Bar Swordtail in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
March
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Five-Bar Swordtail in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Kaeng Krachan National Park's driest months, with about 65 mm of rain against 260 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Five-Bar Swordtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Five-Bar Swordtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see a Five-Bar Swordtail?
2nd of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Five-Bar Swordtail sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Five-Bar Swordtail live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same genus: Graphium
The closest relatives of the Five-Bar Swordtail that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (genus Graphium, Swordtails, Jays, Bluebottles and allies) are Common Bluebottle (about 30%), Tailed Jay (about 30%) and Chain Swordtail (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Five-Bar Swordtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Five-Bar Swordtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.