What are the chances of seeing an Acacia Blood Vein Moth in Kanha National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report an Acacia Blood Vein Moth sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 11th most-seen of the 106 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Acacia Blood Vein Moth in Kanha National Park?
July
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report an Acacia Blood Vein Moth in Kanha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, May and September–October, the lowest months. That is one of Kanha National Park's wettest months, with about 430 mm of rain against 10 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see an Acacia Blood Vein Moth?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Acacia Blood Vein Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see an Acacia Blood Vein Moth?
Only Kanha National Park, in our data
Kanha National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Acacia Blood Vein Moth sightings: about 30% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Acacia Blood Vein Moth live in Kanha National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Acacia Blood Vein Moth that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Comostola laesaria (about 20%) and Black Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Acacia Blood Vein Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Acacia Blood Vein Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Kanha National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.