What are the chances of seeing a Yellow Glassy Tiger in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow Glassy Tiger sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 27 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow Glassy Tiger in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow Glassy Tiger in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow Glassy Tiger?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow Glassy Tiger sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Yellow Glassy Tiger?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Yellow Glassy Tiger sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Taman Negara National Park (Malaysia, about 20%) and Gunung Leuser National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Yellow Glassy Tiger live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow Glassy Tiger that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Common Mapwing (about 30%), Striped Ringlet (about 30%) and Smaller Wood Nymph (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow Glassy Tiger sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow Glassy Tiger is recorded against all the insects logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.