What are the chances of seeing a Common Bluebottle in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Bluebottle sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 27 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Bluebottle in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
June
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Common Bluebottle in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common Bluebottle?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Bluebottle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Common Bluebottle?
4th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Common Bluebottle sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 4th at about 30%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 40%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 30%) and Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Common Bluebottle live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same family: Papilionidae
The closest relatives of the Common Bluebottle that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Papilionidae, Swallowtails and Parnassians) are Great Mormon Swallowtail (about 30%), Green Dragontail Butterfly (about 30%) and Papilio diophantus (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Bluebottle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Bluebottle is recorded against all the insects logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.