What are the chances of seeing an Ayeyarwady Bulbul in Khao Luang National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ayeyarwady Bulbul sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 57 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 123rd most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ayeyarwady Bulbul in Khao Luang National Park?
January and May
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Ayeyarwady Bulbul in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June, September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ayeyarwady Bulbul?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ayeyarwady Bulbul sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see an Ayeyarwady Bulbul?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Ayeyarwady Bulbul sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 70%), Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 60%) and Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ayeyarwady Bulbul live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same genus: Pycnonotus
The closest relatives of the Ayeyarwady Bulbul that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (genus Pycnonotus, Typical Bulbuls) are Red-eyed Bulbul (about 70%), Stripe-throated Bulbul (about 50%) and Black-crested Bulbul (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ayeyarwady Bulbul sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ayeyarwady Bulbul is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (57 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.