What are the chances of seeing a Hairy-backed Bulbul in Khao Luang National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Hairy-backed Bulbul sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 223 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hairy-backed Bulbul in Khao Luang National Park?
May
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Hairy-backed Bulbul in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against about 20% in January–February, June, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Hairy-backed Bulbul?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hairy-backed Bulbul sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Hairy-backed Bulbul?
Yes
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Hairy-backed Bulbul sightings, Khao Luang National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 40%) and Taman Negara National Park (Malaysia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Hairy-backed Bulbul live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same family: Pycnonotidae
The closest relatives of the Hairy-backed Bulbul that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (family Pycnonotidae, Bulbuls) are Red-eyed Bulbul (about 70%), Spectacled Bulbul (about 60%) and Ochraceous Bulbul (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hairy-backed Bulbul sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hairy-backed Bulbul is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (223 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.