What are the chances of seeing a Ferruginous Flycatcher in Khao Luang National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Ferruginous Flycatcher sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 201st most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ferruginous Flycatcher in Khao Luang National Park?
November
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ferruginous Flycatcher in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in December to October, the lowest months. That is one of Khao Luang National Park's wettest months, with about 350 mm of rain against 65 mm in March.
What time of day is best to see a Ferruginous Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ferruginous Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Ferruginous Flycatcher?
3rd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Ferruginous Flycatcher sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Taroko National Park (Taiwan, about 10%) and Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Ferruginous Flycatcher live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same genus: Muscicapa
The closest relatives of the Ferruginous Flycatcher that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (genus Muscicapa, Muscicapa Flycatchers) are Asian Brown Flycatcher (about 30%) and Brown-streaked Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ferruginous Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ferruginous Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.