What are the chances of seeing a Red-throated Barbet in Khao Luang National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Red-throated Barbet sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 528 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 2nd most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-throated Barbet in Khao Luang National Park?
March to May
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Red-throated Barbet in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against about 40% in June and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-throated Barbet?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-throated Barbet sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Red-throated Barbet?
Yes
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Red-throated Barbet sightings, Khao Luang National Park has the highest daily chance: about 70%. Next come Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 30%) and Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-throated Barbet live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same genus: Psilopogon
The closest relatives of the Red-throated Barbet that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (genus Psilopogon, Typical Asian Barbets) are Gold-whiskered Barbet (about 50%), Black-eared Barbet (about 50%) and Lineated Barbet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-throated Barbet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-throated Barbet is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (528 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.