Aegithina lafresnayei
Silhouette: Sheatherius · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
The great iora (Aegithina lafresnayei) is a species of bird in the family Aegithinidae. It is found in Cambodia, China, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. Its natural habitat is subtropical or tropical moist lowland forest. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Cuc Phuong National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 3 | Khao Luang National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 4 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 5 | Khao Yai National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 6 | Khao Sok National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 7 | Doi Inthanon National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Great Iora sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 347 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 96th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February–March, July and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Great Iora in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, the lowest month.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Great Iora sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Great Iora sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 50%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 40%) and Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Great Iora is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Yai National Park (347 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
