What are the chances of seeing an Ashy Woodswallow in Khao Yai National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 1,261 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 13th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ashy Woodswallow in Khao Yai National Park?
May and August
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report an Ashy Woodswallow in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against about 30% in April and October, the lowest months. Those are among Khao Yai National Park's wettest months, with about 230 mm of rain a month against 15 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ashy Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see an Ashy Woodswallow?
Yes
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ashy Woodswallow sightings, Khao Yai National Park has the highest daily chance: about 50%. Next come Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Ashy Woodswallow that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Black-crested Bulbul (about 80%), Asian Fairy-bluebird (about 60%) and Gray-eyed Bulbul (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ashy Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ashy Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Yai National Park (1,261 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.