What are the chances of seeing a Boisduval's Autumn Moth in Kosciuszko National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Boisduval's Autumn Moth sighting in Kosciuszko National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 105 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Boisduval's Autumn Moth in Kosciuszko National Park?
March, October and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Boisduval's Autumn Moth in Kosciuszko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Boisduval's Autumn Moth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Boisduval's Autumn Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Kosciuszko National Park the best place to see a Boisduval's Autumn Moth?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Boisduval's Autumn Moth sightings, Kosciuszko National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Grampians National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Boisduval's Autumn Moth live in Kosciuszko National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Boisduval's Autumn Moth that you can see in Kosciuszko National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Bogong Moth (about 30%), Australian Painted Lady (about 30%) and Correa Brown (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Boisduval's Autumn Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Boisduval's Autumn Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Kosciuszko National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.