What are the chances of seeing a Barred Yellow in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Yellow sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 112th most-seen of the 152 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Barred Yellow in Lago de Yojoa?
January–March and May
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Yellow in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in April and June–December, the lowest months. Those are among Lago de Yojoa's driest months, with about 100 mm of rain a month against 320 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Barred Yellow?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Barred Yellow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Barred Yellow?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Barred Yellow sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 30%), Everglades National Park (United States, about 20%) and Big Cypress National Preserve (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Barred Yellow live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Pieridae
The closest relatives of the Barred Yellow that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Pieridae, Whites, Yellows, and Sulphurs) are Great Southern White (about 20%), Tiger Mimic-White (about 20%) and Orange-Barred Sulphur (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Barred Yellow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Barred Yellow is recorded against all the insects logged in Lago de Yojoa (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.