What are the chances of seeing a White Angled-Sulphur in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White Angled-Sulphur sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 61st most-seen of the 152 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White Angled-Sulphur in Lago de Yojoa?
January and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a White Angled-Sulphur in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–July and September–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White Angled-Sulphur?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White Angled-Sulphur sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a White Angled-Sulphur?
4th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate White Angled-Sulphur sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 20%), Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the White Angled-Sulphur live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Pieridae
The closest relatives of the White Angled-Sulphur that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Pieridae, Whites, Yellows, and Sulphurs) are Great Southern White (about 20%), Tiger Mimic-White (about 20%) and Orange-Barred Sulphur (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White Angled-Sulphur sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White Angled-Sulphur is recorded against all the insects logged in Lago de Yojoa (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.