What are the chances of seeing a Bramble Sawfly in Lamington National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bramble Sawfly sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 179th most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bramble Sawfly in Lamington National Park?
February and March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bramble Sawfly in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and May–November, the lowest months. Those are among Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Bramble Sawfly?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bramble Sawfly sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lamington National Park the best place to see a Bramble Sawfly?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Bramble Sawfly sightings, Lamington National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Bramble Sawfly live in Lamington National Park?
Same order: Hymenoptera
The closest relatives of the Bramble Sawfly that you can see in Lamington National Park (order Hymenoptera, Ants, Bees, Wasps, and Sawflies) are Leptomyrmex tibialis (about 30%), Jumping Jack Ant (about 30%) and Notostigma foreli (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bramble Sawfly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bramble Sawfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.