What are the chances of seeing a Lyell's Swift in Litchfield National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lyell's Swift sighting in Litchfield National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 25th most-seen of the 43 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lyell's Swift in Litchfield National Park?
March
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Lyell's Swift in Litchfield National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, May, August–September and November, the lowest months. That is one of Litchfield National Park's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain against almost none in July.
What time of day is best to see a Lyell's Swift?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lyell's Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Litchfield National Park the best place to see a Lyell's Swift?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Lyell's Swift sightings, Litchfield National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lyell's Swift live in Litchfield National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Lyell's Swift that you can see in Litchfield National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Australian Common Crow (about 50%), Orange Ringlet (about 40%) and Blue Pansy (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lyell's Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lyell's Swift is recorded against all the insects logged in Litchfield National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.