What are the chances of seeing a Copaxa syntheratoides in Los Quetzales National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Copaxa syntheratoides sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 56 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Copaxa syntheratoides in Los Quetzales National Park?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Copaxa syntheratoides in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May, August–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Copaxa syntheratoides?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Copaxa syntheratoides sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Copaxa syntheratoides?
2nd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Copaxa syntheratoides sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Copaxa syntheratoides live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Saturniidae
The closest relatives of the Copaxa syntheratoides that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Saturniidae, Emperor and Giant Silk Moths) are Orizaba Silkmoth (about 10%), Xanthodirphia amarilla (about 10%) and Antheraea godmani (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Copaxa syntheratoides sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Copaxa syntheratoides is recorded against all the insects logged in Los Quetzales National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.