What are the chances of seeing a Black-winged Saltator in Machalilla National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Saltator sighting in Machalilla National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 237th most-seen of the 248 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-winged Saltator in Machalilla National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Saltator in Machalilla National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-winged Saltator?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-winged Saltator sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Machalilla National Park the best place to see a Black-winged Saltator?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Black-winged Saltator sightings, Machalilla National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-winged Saltator live in Machalilla National Park?
Same genus: Saltator
The closest relatives of the Black-winged Saltator that you can see in Machalilla National Park (genus Saltator, Typical Saltators) are Streaked Saltator (about 30%) and Buff-throated Saltator (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-winged Saltator sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-winged Saltator is recorded against all the birds logged in Machalilla National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.