What are the chances of seeing an Asterope leprieuri in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Asterope leprieuri sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Asterope leprieuri in Manu National Park?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Asterope leprieuri in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–June, August and December–February, the lowest months. That is one of Manu National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain against 290 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Asterope leprieuri?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Asterope leprieuri sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Asterope leprieuri?
Only Manu National Park, in our data
Manu National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Asterope leprieuri sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Asterope leprieuri live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Asterope leprieuri that you can see in Manu National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Malachite (about 30%), Julia Heliconian (about 20%) and White Peacock (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Asterope leprieuri sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Asterope leprieuri is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.