What are the chances of seeing a Many-Banded Daggerwing in Manu National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Many-Banded Daggerwing sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 45 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Many-Banded Daggerwing in Manu National Park?
February, September and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Many-Banded Daggerwing in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Many-Banded Daggerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Many-Banded Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Many-Banded Daggerwing?
14th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Many-Banded Daggerwing sightings, Manu National Park ranks 14th at about 20%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%) and Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Many-Banded Daggerwing live in Manu National Park?
Same genus: Marpesia
The closest relatives of the Many-Banded Daggerwing that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Marpesia, Daggerwings) are Crethon Daggerwing (about 10%), Sunset Daggerwing (about 10%) and Orange Daggerwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Many-Banded Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Many-Banded Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (45 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.