Canthon luteicollis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yasuní National Park | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | |
| 2 | Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | |
| 3 | Tambopata National Reserve | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 4 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manaus | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Canthon luteicollis sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February–March, May, August–September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Canthon luteicollis in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July, October and December–January, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Canthon luteicollis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Canthon luteicollis sightings, Manu National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 10%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Same family: Scarabaeidae
The closest relatives of the Canthon luteicollis that you can see in Manu National Park (family Scarabaeidae, Scarabs) are Enema pan (about 30%), Giant Dung Digger (about 10%) and Rhinoceros Dung Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Canthon luteicollis is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
