Dendropsophus kamagarini
Silhouette: Dmitry Bogdanov (vectorized by T. Michael Keesey) · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
Dendropsophus kamagarini is a frog in the family Hylidae. It is endemic to Bolivia, Peru and Brazil. Scientists have seen it between 150 and 1696 meters above sea level. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 2 | Tambopata National Reserve | 🇵🇪 Peru |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Inotawa Tree Frog sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 44 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 67 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April and November–February
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Inotawa Tree Frog in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to August, the lowest months. Those are among Manu National Park's wettest months, with about 240 mm of rain a month against 60 mm in August.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Inotawa Tree Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Inotawa Tree Frog sightings, Manu National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 20%).
Same genus: Dendropsophus
The closest relatives of the Inotawa Tree Frog that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Dendropsophus, Yellow Tree Frogs) are Red-skirted Tree Frog (about 20%), Mottled Clown Treefrog (about 10%) and Acre Tree Frog (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Inotawa Tree Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Manu National Park (44 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
