What are the chances of seeing a Grey Junglefowl in Mudumalai National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Junglefowl sighting in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, based on 457 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Junglefowl in Mudumalai National Park?
April
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Junglefowl in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, against about 10% in September, the lowest month. That is one of Mudumalai National Park's driest months, with about 55 mm of rain against 230 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Junglefowl?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Junglefowl sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Mudumalai National Park the best place to see a Grey Junglefowl?
4th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Grey Junglefowl sightings, Mudumalai National Park ranks 4th at about 40%. The best odds are in Periyar National Park (India, about 60%), Nagarhole National Park (India, about 50%) and Bandipur National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Grey Junglefowl live in Mudumalai National Park?
Same family: Phasianidae
The closest relatives of the Grey Junglefowl that you can see in Mudumalai National Park (family Phasianidae, Pheasants, Grouse, and Allies) are Common Peafowl (about 60%), Grey Francolin (about 20%) and Jungle Bush Quail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Junglefowl sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Junglefowl is recorded against all the birds logged in Mudumalai National Park (457 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.