What are the chances of seeing a Brahminy Starling in Mudumalai National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Brahminy Starling sighting in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, based on 726 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Brahminy Starling in Mudumalai National Park?
April
In that month about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Brahminy Starling in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, against about 50% in March and September–December, the lowest months. That is one of Mudumalai National Park's driest months, with about 55 mm of rain against 230 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Brahminy Starling?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brahminy Starling sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Mudumalai National Park the best place to see a Brahminy Starling?
2nd of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Brahminy Starling sightings, Mudumalai National Park ranks 2nd at about 60%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Brahminy Starling live in Mudumalai National Park?
Same genus: Sturnia
The closest relatives of the Brahminy Starling that you can see in Mudumalai National Park (genus Sturnia, Sturnia Starlings) are Malabar Starling (about 10%) and Chestnut-tailed Starling (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Brahminy Starling sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brahminy Starling is recorded against all the birds logged in Mudumalai National Park (726 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.