What are the chances of seeing an Austral Thrush in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report an Austral Thrush sighting in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, based on 920 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the most-seen of the 111 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Austral Thrush in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
June and September–November
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report an Austral Thrush in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, against about 60% in February to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Austral Thrush?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Austral Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nahuel Huapi National Park the best place to see an Austral Thrush?
4th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Austral Thrush sightings, Nahuel Huapi National Park ranks 4th at about 70%. The best odds are in Tierra del Fuego National Park (Argentina, about 90%), Torres del Paine National Park (Chile, about 70%) and Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (Chile, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Austral Thrush live in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Austral Thrush that you can see in Nahuel Huapi National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Southern House Wren (about 50%), Rufous-collared Sparrow (about 50%) and Dark-bellied Cinclodes (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Austral Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Austral Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Nahuel Huapi National Park (920 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.